Good question. The buildings were approx 30 years old when they came down.
System
·
2010-04-02T05:05:26Z
Why the dogs didn't bark...
Hint: The Hound of the Baskervilles and why the dog didn't bark.
If Bob Kerrey opened his mouth about why he thinks it goes back thirty years, and it actually does, I guarantee you, on is next flight home the last thing he'd ever see would be a very hot ball of orange flame moving very rapidly towards his seat on the plane.
These dudes know what went down on 9/11, they are quite frankly too damn terrified to do anything about it.
More like he really didn't care. Perhaps apathy? A basic understanding that his role was for show as all politicians are? He seems to accept the banality of that existence as the norm and expects nothing to change which is always a sign of things about to change and drastically. Perfect storm approaching on all fronts. Seems the official 9-11 crew should be wary of their own papal moment coming rather soon.
System
·
2012-09-11T03:34:55Z
Curiouser an Curiouser
WTC was built 30 years ago. Sic! Look at The Sculpture between the towers. Follow the trail.
Just discovered this today. Published on Oct 31, 2012. Can not speak for it's veracity; frankly, have not even viewed it yet. It is reportedly to have been created with a contribution from Michael Rupert (who I hold in high esteem), which caught my attention. Came here to check the latest from another source.
Just watched a video regarding David Brin Science fiction writer, he was talking about how he used to be employed by the CIA to generate possible terrorist situations because of his vast knowledge of scifi. He seems like an intelligent man but can see the ego is what is pulling him back.
The thing that bothered me was the way in which he spoke about 911 and how he is smug about 'predicteding' it in page 209 of one of his books.
"Yes, that is where -- in a creepy "Twilight zone" moment -- I seemed to predict the events of 9/11 in detail and then the following Patriot Act: "What might have happened if those bombers actually succeeded in toppling both towers of New York's World Trade Center, killing tens of thousands. Or imagine that nuclear or bio-plague terrorists someday devastate a city. Now picture the public reaction if the FBI ever managed to show real (or exaggerated) evidence that they were impeded in preventing the disaster by an inability to tap coded transmissions sent by the conspirators. They would follow this proof with a petition for new powers, to prevent the same thing from happening again."
Picture of the paragraph [Link]
What he doesn't realise is that maybe it was this that planted the seed, after all he was being used to generate ideas for 'possible attacks before hand'. What do you think?
Presentation by Ken O'Keefe showing overwhelming evidence that 9/11 was a false flag operation with clear evidence as to who did it and why.
See also [Link] for a more in depth analysis of the evidence.
There is also other amazing evidence not covered here, for example by Rebekah Roth a former flight attendant: [Link]
also another interesting presentation:
[Link]
I wonder what he meant by a 30 year old conspiracy?