OF THE
TIMES
Dwoods44 [!!!] He saw that consciousness was the way to understand reality. I should add he never wanted to be famous [during his lifetime ], and his wish was granted.You rock.
Nathan Carney The excitement and enjoyment of the conversation was palpable.I, uh... think this is fine formulation; food for thought? It sounds like "splitting attention" (which may have the counter-intuitive function of requiring [C|C] cross-hemisphere communication) between what you're actively doing, while monitor your state or your interaction, "up to objective engagement with reality", as you put it.
I only listened for 15 minutes as it was late and I was confused.
Yes a key takeaway was/is a disciplined disposition.
So this tells me that the left brain has to engage in direct, not complex necessarily, activity that fully engages the right brain accordingly to prolativities.
And this is the proper engagement with uncertainty and information, opening one up to objective engagement with reality.
Not trying to make a word salad, just got to read the books.
azigzagidiot Thank you. I appreciate Peter Ouspensky looking out from your avatar. He was always trying to understand reality in his early works of Tertium Organum and A New Model of the Universe. He saw that consciousness was the way to understand reality. I should add he never wanted to be famous, and his wish was granted.Finally an answer to something I queried on before......good stuff indeed! Sometimes it is best to just be patient and then the answer will be revealed.
Shangri a good conversation - one bound to eternal pain without ample offerings of escape - so, Thank-You...
--
.I believe..truth is, knowing that immaculate moment, at the edge of time - because it that then, that reveals the repeating movements dishonesty.
I am not sure how he died, ...Me neither. Despite his age, the opportune death of another critical voice (like Kary Mullis) is very suspicious.
... but he was opposing the plandemic virus theory.Not sure about his views in this matter. After all, he had been entrenched enough in the virus theory to get a Nobel price for "detecting" the so-called HIV virus. I only know he vehemently opposed the clot shots.
Back to the topic, three searched resources now all mention Kaznacheyev experiments being published but now being unaccessible, or there is some obfuscation or difficulty, at least. Kaznacheyev was also involved with a construction called "Kozyrev's mirrors", a purportedly magnetically shielded structure, and he wrote a book called Cosmic Consciousness.That was my point. Supposedly done in the '80 and in the Soviet Union, information is scarce. Only from questionable sources that seem not to care too much what they copy and past.
A+
A+
A+
What caused the first out-take? The hard Koch?
"Objectivity involves the habit of mind and spirit, not the following of external procedures or rules; put another way, the objectivity lies not in propositions but in a disciplined disposition." - McGilchrist
"Truth and SIGNS(science)!" - Luc
You all at 2x speed is almost too much fluency! Almost.
Consciousness implied by the discernment shown even by "chemical" affinities?
Also the outboard motor comparison I'd never heard before, it's a good one, good point in favor of intelligent design. legos vs. logos.. lol.
Fine job -- very interesting topics, you've pique my interest in McGilchrist, and Whitehead... must be A.N. Whitehead.
🥼
I think Chemistry is King... but i am biased. Look at how Nuclear shell models built out Pythagorean solids or Hamiltonian graphs/cycles(opinion)
**no substack links given "below" that I can see